CAMERON —
According to the results of the recently released “2011 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation” (Survey), more people than ever (age 16 and older) participated in wildlife recreation. Hunter numbers (13.7 million) grew nine percent from 2006 to 2011. The number of anglers (33.1 million) increased 11 percent during the same time period. And the number of wildlife watchers (71.8 million) held steady from 2006 to 2011 while increasing nine percent over the last 10 years.
Even more significant is the economic impact these pastimes make. Hunters spent $34 billion on equipment, licenses, trips, and other related expenses in 2011. Anglers spent $41.8 billion on fishing-related activities. And watchers, the largest group, spent $55 billion feeding, watching, and photographing wildlife. That’s a $131 billion economy (nearly one percent of gross domestic product) directly attributable to wildlife recreation.
The 2011 Survey is the 12th in a series of surveys conducted every five years since 1955. The purpose of these surveys is to collect information about Americans who hunt, fish and watch wildlife. Information is collected by the U.S. Census Bureau based on interviews with 48,627 households.
Though the Survey focuses on people age 16 and older, it does collect some information on children. Those results indicate that in 2011, 1.8 million 6- to 15-year-olds hunted, 8.5 million fished, and 11.7 million watched wildlife.
One of the more interesting findings of the survey is that while hunters and anglers pay their way, watchers do not. Hunters, for example, spend more than $986 million on licenses, federal duck stamps, and various other state authorized hunting stamps. Anglers spend more than $600 million on licenses and stamps.
Plus, hunters and anglers pay a federal excise tax on their equipment. In 1937, the Federal Aid to Wildlife Restoration Act placed a federal excise tax (11 percent) on sporting arms and ammunition, with the proceeds distributed to the states (based on a formula that considers both number of hunting licenses and land area) for wildlife research and restoration. In 1950, the Federal Aid in Fish Restoration Act established a federal excise tax on sport fishing equipment (10 percent), with the proceeds reapportioned to the state for fisheries projects.
Watchers, on the other hand, are not required to buy a license to enjoy wildlife. Nor do they pay a federal excise tax on the equipment they use.
Watchers enjoy wildlife thanks to sportsmen and women. The notion that watchers should pay their fair share for wildlife conservation is not new. It’s been around since the passage of the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act of 1980. The biggest obstacle to an excise tax on watcher’s equipment is resistance from manufacturers of those products. They resist anything that increases the price of their products.
Unlike farsighted hunters and anglers in the first half of the 20th century who demanded they be taxed to fund wildlife conservation for the future, watchers have been content to enjoy the free ride provided by sportsmen.
The Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act of 1980 encourages states “to develop conservation plans for nongame fish and wildlife of ecological, educational, aesthetic, cultural, recreational, economic or scientific value.” Unfortunately, the act has never been funded at the federal level.
One obvious way to provide additional federal funding for wildlife conservation would be to impose a federal excise tax on bird food, feeders, optics, cameras and other products watchers use. In 2011, watchers spent $11.3 billion on wildlife watching equipment (food, feeders, nest boxes, baths, optics, camera equipment, etc.). A federal excise tax of just five percent would generate $565 million annually. Even a one percent excise tax would raise more than $100 million. That would make watchers, hunters, and anglers equals in the world of wildlife conservation.
Alternatively, a voluntary, collectable, $10 annual federal wildlife watching stamp, sold at wildlife refuges, state parks, nature centers, and wild bird stores, might be a small step in the right direction. At least it would give watchers an opportunity to support wildlife conservation. And I can’t imagine any watcher objecting to that.
— Send questions and
comments to Dr. Scott
Shalaway, 2222 Fish Ridge Road, Cameron, WV 26033, or by e-mail at sshalaway@aol.com
Outdoors
Wildlife recreation continues to grow
- Outdoors
-
-
Hunting has become more mainstream
As sportsmen, we live by an ethical code of conduct. We are taught by our mentors not to take our way of life for granted and to be aware of our actions as not to cause offense to others. In short, we are taught to behave in a manner as to not make a non-hunter into an anti-hunter.
-
Birding among outdoor passions
If you love the outdoors, there are probably some activities you like better than others. Maybe it’s trout fishing or deer hunting. My passion is birds. I love the spring migration when new species return almost daily.
-
Setting the record straight on rabbits
Thanks to cartoon characters such as Bugs Bunny, the rabbits we see in our backyards, eastern cottontails, are familiar to almost everyone. And yet I suspect that most people think they are rodents. They are not. Rabbits and hares are lagomorphs, members of the mammalian order Lagomorpha.
-
Fickle weather can wreck plans
Well, it’s officially spring. We have “sprung forward” into daylight saving time in hopes of long, sunny evenings to play and work outdoors in the glorious, warm rays of the sun. In return for our daily routines being altered by the time change, we are awarded with unpredictable weather and mud season — gee, thanks!
-
Black deer among nature’s rarities
A few weeks ago, Joan Robinson contacted me after she noticed something out of the usual while driving along a Hampshire County backroad in the Eastern Panhandle. It was so unusual she even questioned herself at what her eyes were actually seeing.
-
Male half of nesting eagle pair feared dead
One of southern West Virginia’s much-loved and only confirmed pair of nesting American Bald Eagles is suspected dead and the pair’s eggs located at the tip of Brooks Island off W.Va. 20 are in jeopardy.
Wendy Perrone, executive director of Three River Avian Center, said National Park Service Law Enforcement was notified that an Amtrak train hit the eagle Sunday around 10:30 a.m.
Since Sunday, the Park Service, Three Rivers and dedicated volunteers have scouted the track and surrounding area from Brooks Island to Sandstone Falls, but no one has recovered the bird. The male bird, affectionately called Whitey, has also not returned to the nest, leading experts to believe he was killed. -
There is help for anglers getting started
According to statistics from the National Surveys of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation, which are published every five years, the number of anglers in the U.S. is in a steady decline. Over the last 20 years the number of anglers has dropped from 35.6 million in 1991 to 33.1 million in 2011.
-
Beckley among places to ‘talk turkey’
This past week brought us snow and rain. Like my kids are fond of saying in a very sarcastic tone, “Really?” For the sportsmen in our area, the last couple of days of winter can be a downtime in the action. For those needing to scratch the hunting and fishing itch, I have a little news that might just do the trick.
-
‘How do robins survive winter conditions?’
Winter must be winding down because I’m getting letters and e-mails about winter robins.
-
Sequester impacting hunting, fishing industries
A news release from Bass Anglers Sportsman Society (B.A.S.S.) Communications came across my desk this week, and I felt the information was worth sharing.
- More Outdoors Headlines
-
Hunting has become more mainstream



