Is the war on fossil fuels detrimental?
A recent headline reads “Manufacturer: EPA against all fossil fuels, not just coal.”
This is true, but the article suggests to me that Mr. Drevna has forgotten history or hopes that we have, and that we don’t know what other countries are doing with ethanol.
In 1973, President Nixon mandated that starting in January 1983, all leaded gasoline will be phased out. Nixon gave engine manufacturers 10 years to re-tool their factories.
This was due to the EPA belief that the lead from gasoline was making its way into our water and food supply. We now know this to be true, but we also know that there are other causes as well.
Forget the fact that if we demanded that the U.S. convert to 100 percent ethanol, what Mr. Drevna is not telling us is that West Virginia, eight other states, and the U.S. government wouldn’t be able to collect any gas taxes from 100 percent ethanol, or from hydrogen for that matter.
The oil companies are reduced to refining only motor oil, grease, tar, and asphalt. Oh, wait a minute; we already have synthetic oil and grease, oops.
To boost his nuclear power agenda, in December 1981 President Reagan cut the funding for federal mine inspectors, starting the war on coal.
Is the war on fossil fuels detrimental to national security? Absolutely not, the U.S. military will always have all of the fossil fuel it needs. Any jet engine can be modified to operate on ethanol, propane, butane, methane, or hydrogen. Diesel engines were originally designed to run on vegetable oil.
The high spike in food prices in 2008 was due entirely to the high cost of oil which caused shipping prices to rise.
Brazil has already mandated that all engines sold in Brazil are to be able to operate on 100 percent ethanol.
General Motors Chevrolet Division already makes a car with an engine that runs on 100 percent ethanol, but is sold only in Brazil.
I just want you to remember the facts, Mr. Drevna.
Gator Williams
Beckley
Our Readers Speak
Our Readers Speak - Saturday, September 22, 2012
- Our Readers Speak
-
-
Submit your opinion to Our Readers Speak section
The Register-Herald welcomes your opinion. Please e-mail your letters, through your computer's mail program, to readersspeak@register-herald.com or via the postal service to: Our Readers Speak, P.O. Box 2398, Beckley, WV 25802.
-
Our Readers Speak — Tuesday, June 18, 2013
I lost election, but that’s not the end
-
Our Readers Speak — Monday, June 17, 2013
Coal miners shouldn’t have to suffer more
- Our Readers Speak
- Our Readers Speak — Saturday, June 15, 2013
-
Our Readers Speak — Friday, June 14, 2013
Beckley Council acting like turkeys?
-
Our Readers Speak — Thursday, June 13, 2013
Thanks for help with Lions Club track meet
Regarding UMWA miners, Patriot Coal
- Our Readers Speak — Wednesday, June 12, 2013
- Our Readers Speak — Tuesday, June 11, 2013
-
Our Readers Speak — Saturday, June 8, 2013
I am very pleased that lawmakers did not pass the stupid “fireworks” law. I think Daniel Hall, D-Wyoming, should be happy he did not push this and he might rethink his feelings on it for next year. The majority of citizens care more about the economy and a job to buy food, not stupid items like fireworks.
- More Our Readers Speak Headlines
-
Submit your opinion to Our Readers Speak section



