Last week, the state Supreme Court declined to intervene in a case involving a high school cheerleading team.
Tolsia High School claimed it was unfairly punished when a cheerleading stunt that was deemed illegal knocked the team out of state competition. A Wayne County circuit judge agreed and issued an injunction that would allow Tolsia to compete.
The state Secondary School Activities Commission wanted the Supreme Court to overturn the injunction, but the high court refused to hear the case.
Was it a landmark case? No. Was it an important case? Outside Wayne County, probably not. It didn’t involve a multimillion-dollar civil judgment or a criminal case resulting in a life prison sentence.
But it points to a bigger issue.
For much of the current legislative session, a bill to establish an intermediate appellate court in West Virginia drew much attention.
Supporters said the creation of such a court would improve the state’s business climate by guaranteeing an automatic right of appeal and give lower court rulings a more thorough review. Under the current system, they said, those who want to appeal can petition the Supreme Court. The court then accepts or rejects the petition, but no explanation is given if the request is rejected.
The high court itself opposed the creation of a new court. And other opponents cited the costs of establishing another level in the judicial system.
Last Tuesday, two days before the Tolsia decision was announced, the Senate Finance Committee rejected the intermediate appellate court legislation.
Sen. Jesse Guills, R-Greenbrier, who pushed for defeat of the bill, said he believes supporters have a point, but he wants to give the Supreme Court a chance to make changes before lawmakers get involved.
“We’ve been given assurances by Supreme Court Justice (Robin) Davis that the Supreme Court is going to give this serious consideration, and I think that opportunity should be given,” Guills said.
One of the changes the high court is expected to make would require it to provide more thorough explanations for its decisions.
We’re not sure the Supreme Court will go far enough, however. But this is its chance. If the justices do not adequately address the issue, and promptly, then the Legislature needs to intervene.
Everyone, regardless of the case, should have the basic right to appeal, and if an appeal is denied, the appellant deserves a written opinion as to why.
West Virginia needs to remain progressive in its efforts to clean up its legal image. The five high court justices can choose to lead or be led. The ball is in their court, so to speak.
But significant changes must be made, no matter who makes them.
Editorials
Right to appeal
- Editorials
-
-
If you don’t think so, you’d better think again
EPA regulations turning the screw on coal industry
-
Airport projects crucial
Tom Cochran and others at the Raleigh County Memorial Airport can breathe a little easier, or at least take a deep breath and exhale, after word came from Sen. Jay Rockefeller’s office last week that a deal has been struck between the two chambers in Congress to authorize long-term funding, into 2015, for the Federal Aviation Administration.
- Thumbs — Saturday, Feb. 4, 2012
-
It’s not a choice
Whether a bill to eliminate tolls on the West Virginia Turnpike when the current bonds expire some eight years from now is passed by the Legislature and signed into law or not, one thing is absolutely certain — the state Transportation Department has the responsibility to maintain that 88-mile stretch of Interstate highway.
-
On the shelf
A Senate bill (SB168) offered by 13 of the upper chamber’s members that would have given counties the option to boost the pay of county commissioners, sheriffs, county and circuit clerks, assessors and prosecuting attorneys by at least $10,000 each has apparently been shelved and will do nothing but draw dust this legislative session.
-
The time is now
Drug abuse.
-
Rarified air
Bolen takes his place among coaching elite
-
Nail ’em
Kudos to Peck and her Sophia police force for going after tire vandals
- Thumbs — Saturday, Jan. 28, 2012
-
Vote buying? No problem
Another antiquated state law, and a subsequent West Virginia Supreme Court ruling made nearly nine decades ago, has put the spotlight on an election in the Mountain State for the wrong reasons, yet again.
- More Editorials Headlines
-
If you don’t think so, you’d better think again






